It would seem (at least to me), that no matter how many decks are shuffled togather, because you still have the same proportion of high cards, low and middle cards, you would still have the exact same odds with a one deck or one thousand deck shoe. Thats how it seems. Of course, reality does not work that way, and we know that, the more decks shuffled togather, the better for the house. OK, I understand that.
I have seen discussions how, most stratagies are fairly close to each other, only slight differance.
My question is, are these test across the board, or tested on, say, computer generated single deck games, then tried live with double deck games?
That is, lets say you play mostly double deck games, I play 6 deck. AC uses 8 deck. Is one strategy better for one of these then the other, or is a good strategy a good strategy no matter how many deck you play against?
(I know how running count/true count conversions also work.)








